Department Environmental Social Sciences

Cirus – Sustainability Transitions & Innovation Studies

Our research contributes to a better understanding of how and where radically novel, more sustainable technologies, products and services develop, how they diffuse in space, and how they may support sustainability transitions in locked-in sectors like energy, water, mobility, construction, or chemicals. 

Cirus explores how transformative technologies, such as renewable energies, decentralized water reuse, net-zero construction, low-carbon mobility or animal-free chemicals testing develop, diffuse, and turn into global standards. Our research at the interface of innovation studies, economic geography, and institutional sociology develops state of the art theories and methodologies for understanding how socio-technical systems shift toward more sustainable development trajectories and how these shifts may be supported by firms, policy makers and civil society. A focal interest of our work is exploring the geographies of innovation and transition processes.

Our take on sustainability transitions and innovation dynamics

Cirus’ theoretical home is socio-technical systems thinking. In this perspective, innovation and sectoral transitions depend on shifts in interdependent technological and social structures, instead of mere technological changes. The core assumption is that novel technologies only function properly if they are embedded in fitting institutional structures (e.g. regulations, value concerns, routines) and that social structures in turn shape the direction of technological change. Transitions and 'green' innovation dynamics are therefore not limited to the “adoption” of new, more sustainable products in existing markets, but require the active alignment of technologies with user practices, business models, laws, and complementary infrastructures. These alignments typically get established in long-term processes and require actors to strategically construct supportive 'innovation system' structures.

Our research agenda accordingly revolves around three conceptual building blocks. First, it aims at understanding innovation processes in newly emerging ‘green’ industries from an innovation system perspective. Second, it focuses on exploring the institutional dynamics and value shifts that accompany the creation of radically new solutions for addressing complex environmental challenges. And third, most of our work tackles innovation and transitions dynamics from a spatial perspective. It explores in depth how transitions are embedded in specific places, why they happen in some regions and not others and how multi-scalar linkages influence their dynamics.

Innovation and industrial dynamics in ‘green’ sectors

A key vantage point of our research focuses on technological innovation happening in newly emerging industries like decentralized water reuse, renewable energies, or environmentally benign chemicals. Typically, innovation dynamics in these ‘new-to-the-world' industries are not depending on firm-internal R&D alone, but rather on distributed networks with research institutes, governmental actors, financial investors and civil society. As such, our conceptual contributions in this field build strongly on innovation system theories. This approach allows us to analyze how firms interact with a systemic environment that supports them in mobilizing financial investment, constructing niche markets, or legitimizing radically novel solutions with decision makers and end users.

The innovation system lens allows us to explain how actors with complementary expertise need to team up for successfully launching new products and services, how they can strategically mobilize system resources needed to establish new clean tech industries and how they can jointly tackle systemic barriers that limit their development potential. A core question in our research agenda concerns how innovation system structures can be strategically built up. Other questions include: How and where do innovation activities in green sectors emerge, how do actors create joint strategies to overcome development barriers and at what places and scales do innovation system structures form in newly emerging industries?

More specific research questions focus on how the system resources needed for developing ‘green’ industrial paths can be mobilized both locally and through multi-scalar networks, how firms in peripheral regions can draw on resources developed elsewhere when developing green industrial paths or how transformative innovation moves from early niche applications to challenging taken-for-granted sectoral structures. A key question also revolves around understanding how supportive innovation system structures differ between industry types. Should e.g. policy strategies to support water reuse solutions differ from policies supporting low-carbon urban mobility?

Binz, C.; Truffer, B. (2017) Global innovation systems - a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts, Research Policy, 46(7), 1284-1298, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012, Institutional Repository

Institutional dynamics and value shifts toward sustainability

A second major research theme of Cirus is exploring how institutional structures condition innovation processes, how they impact new technologies’ success or failure, as well as their development direction. By institutions we denote all those regulative, normative and cognitive rules that actors accept as relevant for selecting and/or justifying their actions. Institutions are a core explanatory factor for the success or failure of innovation processes and for understanding the legitimation or refutation of new solutions by users, regulators or society at large.

One of the core characteristics of institutional structures is that they are based on conventions among members of a society. This means that they must be constantly reproduced and sanctioned to serve as binding orientations for all actors. Due to this mutual reinforcement, institutions are in general very hard to change and may represent high barriers for socio-technical transitions. However, institutions may also be the target of strategic interventions by actors that aim at changing the rules of the game in a way that serves their own interests better. 

Specific research questions relate to how institutional structures shape the course of transitions in specific sectors like energy, urban water, chemicals, construction or transport. We analyze, more specifically, how legitimacy of new technologies is created, how early markets for radically new products are constructed, and how different actors can jointly change hindering institutional structures. We also investigate how visions and expectations of innovating actors shape the course of emerging technologies and analyze how specific portfolios of institutional structures provide advantages to particular regions trying to gain a head start as hosts of new industries.

Most recently, our focus has shifted to analyzing how processes of “valuation” impact the development of new technologies. By valuation we denote the specific institutional structures and processes by which technologies, products or services get associated with specific moral values.  Valuation is often enacted through so-called “valuation devices”, i.e. procedures that assess and communicate whether a specific product is congruent with a given set of values. An example for Cirus’ work is ecolabels for hydropower generated electricity in Switzerland or quality standards for wastewater treatment plants in Bangalore. By analyzing the construction principles of such valuation devices, we may anticipate future.

Fuenfschilling, L.; Truffer, B. (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Research Policy, 43(4), 772-791, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010, Institutional Repository

The geographies of transitions in a globalized world

A third overarching research theme focuses on the analysis of how trans-local or trans-national processes shape transitions. While conventional transition research tends to examine sectoral transformations mostly within particular regions (e.g., the Netherlands) and at given geographical scales (e.g., cities or nations), our research agenda explores how transitions depend on complex interactions across multiple locations and spatial scales. Our work on the geographies of sustainability transitions (GeoST) shows that the geographic dimension is not just another context condition, but a key explanatory factor in understanding how transitions come about, how relevant innovation processes are spread across the world and how and where structural change can be actively influenced by policy makers, firms and civil society.

We focus on two key questions. First, we examine the relevant structures and dynamics at different spatial scales that impede the emergence and adoption of transformative innovations. For example, our work on ‘global socio-technical regimes’, shows that unsustainable socio-technical configurations often get institutionalized at a global scale. Global regime configurations like centralized water infrastructures, car-centric urban mobility or fossil energy tend to diffuse widely in space, inhibiting the adoption of more sustainable, locally adapted solutions. Understanding the mechanisms through which global regimes impede the diffusion of more sustainable solutions and how innovative regions can shield themselves from global regimes is a key question for academia and policymaking.

Second, we explore the multi-scalar structures and dynamics that enable transformative change. Our work on ‘global innovation systems’ explores in depth how innovation processes in emerging clean tech industries such as solar energy, decentralized water reuse or low-carbon mobility benefit from interrelationships between different regions, countries, and international arenas. Particular contributions of our past research have been on providing a better understanding of how peripheral regions may develop into global leaders (electric vehicle batteries in China), how seemingly deprived regions can act as hotbeds for the development of radically new technologies (water reuse in Bengaluru), and what it would take for currently leading industrial regions to keep their position when their core technologies start to shift radically (electric vehicles in car manufacturing regions of Germany).

Truffer, B.; Murphy, J. T.; Raven, R. (2015) The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63-72, doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004, Institutional Repository

Methods

We employ a broad range of qualitative and semi-quantitative methods, with a strong expertise in conducting in-depth case studies using literature analysis, semi-structured expert interviews and qualitative content analysis. More recently, we have pioneered and are further refining a novel methodological approach to identify and measure shifts in socio-technical configurations over time and space. This approach named socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA) is part of the family of social network analysis methods but focuses on semantic networks instead of actor collaboration networks. While STCA enables the retracing of socio-technical system dynamics, we typically combine it with more explanatory methods like expert interviews, qualitative case studies, process tracing or qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). For more information on this method, please visit our online STCA guidebook.

Our main methods:

- In-depth case studies

- Expert interviews

- Literature analysis

- Qualitative content analysis

- Socio-technical configuration analysis (STCA)

- Quantitative text analysis

Impact

The conceptual anchoring of Cirus’ research in innovation studies and economic geography provides a strong foundation for strategic consultancy for a broad range of actors dealing with ‘green’ innovation and transition phenomena. Cirus has accumulated strong expertise in advising strategic planning processes, technology roadmapping, regional infrastructure planning, innovation strategies of individual organizations (companies, NGOs, government offices, research organizations, etc.) or setting up intermediary structures fostering complex innovation processes (e.g. for the development of an ecolabel electricity from renewable resources).

Impact oriented methodologies

Specific impact-oriented methods encompass the conception and implementation of participatory foresight and scenario planning, developing multi-actor valuation devices, roadmapping for emerging technology fields and modelling of transition trajectories.

Real-World Labs

A very noteworthy recent initiative of Cirus researchers jointly with colleagues from other Eawag departments has been the set-up of a real-world research platform in Bangalore, India (the WaterReuseLab). This project operates as a collaboration platform for local actors developing innovative decentralized water reuse solutions. Cirus has initiated the platform and supports it through research projects that apply a systemic perspective on the key barriers to creating high-quality and scalable water reuse solutions. The platform is open to other research groups interested in conducting research in this highly dynamic urban context.

Management of national and global innovation networks

Beyond urban living labs, we also engage in the management of local, regional, national and even global actor networks aiming for sustainability transitions in specific sectors.

- Over the last years, we have initiated a global innovation network developing innovative urban water reuse solutions jointly with UC Berkeley, Eawag and BlueTech Research. The network combines leading technology companies, researchers and city officials from ‘lighthouse cities’ experimenting with transformative water reuse solutions like San Francisco, New York, Hamburg, Helsingborg, Bangalore and Sydney (see our white paper).

- At the national level, we have recently finalized a roadmapping process for the implementation of decentralized water management concepts across Switzerland resulting in a position paper for actors from the Swiss confederation, cantonal administrations, professional associations, utilities and consultancies.

- At the regional level, we supported strategic infrastructure planning processes in several catchment areas of wastewater treatment plants in Switzerland formulating a general methodology for infrastructure foresight.

- At a city level, we conducted research on new approaches to urban planning especially for countries in the Global South that struggle with upgrading rapidly growing informal settlements. We proposed new inroads to effectively leverage participation processes and to better understand barriers to the successful implementation of national and international infrastructure upgrading strategies (see our project SUSIS). Our results informed the national Kenian upgrading program KISIP in the development of its second major program phase. In another project we focused on how success of sanitation innovations in informal settlements may depend on joint activities by local policy makers, utilities, community-based organizations, but also international NGOs and donors (see our project SuSARA).

Academic community services

Besides supporting real-world innovation and investment strategies, we are very proactive in providing high-level academic community services. B. Truffer acts as the Editor in chief of the core journal of transition studies network (Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions). C. Binz leads the “geography of transitions” thematic group of the Sustainability Transitions Research Network). Finally, we have been selected to host the yearly International Sustainability Transitions Network conference in Zürich in 2026.

Team

Group Leaders

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Truffer Group leader, Group Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5670 Send Mail
Dr. Christian Binz Group Leader, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5030 Send Mail

Scientists / PostDocs

Dr. Johan Miörner Guest Researcher, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 6493 Send Mail
Dr. Meike Löhr Scientist, Group: Cirus, PEGO Tel. +41 58 765 6492 Send Mail

PhD Students

Djamila Lesch PhD Student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5660 Send Mail
Maximilian Hoos PhD Student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5481 Send Mail
Muhil Nesi PhD student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5905 Send Mail
Till Beer PhD Student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 6413 Send Mail

Research assistants & guests

Stefan Vollenweider Guest Researcher, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5427 Send Mail
Sofia Aalbu Research Assistant, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 6719 Send Mail
Jeanine Janz Research Assistant, Group: PEGO Tel. +41 58 765 5345 Send Mail
Claudia Tschan Tel. +41 58 765 6428 Send Mail

Teaching

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Truffer Group leader, Group Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5670 Send Mail

Bernhard Truffer lectures regularly in several courses at Utrecht University at the innovation studies section (methods and transitions in the global south) courses, and the economics and geography department (capita selecta of leading scholars).

Furthermore, he regularly supervises master students at Utrecht University.


Dr. Christian Binz Group Leader, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5030 Send Mail

Christian Binz is the main lecturer in a master's seminar at the University of Zurich: Geography of Sustainability Transitions.

He also acts as a guest lecturer in a master course at Lund University: Globalization and Innovation.

In addition, he has been actively involved as a guest lecturer in courses at the University of Bern, Florence, EPFL, and the University of Neuchatel.

He also regularly supervises master students at the University of Zurich and Lund University.


Dr. Johan Miörner Guest Researcher, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 6493 Send Mail

Johan Miörner is an associate senior lecturer at Lund University with extensive teaching experience at all levels. At the Department of Human Geography he coordinates and is the main teacher on three courses: Economic Geography (7,5 ECTS), Human Geography: Bachelor Thesis (15 ECTS) and Human Geography: Bachelor Thesis in Urban and Regional Planning (15 ECTS). At the Department of Service Studies, he coordinates and teaches one course: Economic Geography of the Service Sector (7,5 ECTS).

He is also a guest lecturer in courses at the National PhD Program in Human Geography: Economic Geography (7,5 ECTS) and Future Geographies (7,5 ECTS).

In addition, he continuously supervising bachelor- and master students in Human and Economic Geography and Economic History.


Till Beer PhD Student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 6413 Send Mail

Till Beer supports Christian Binz in the master's seminar at the University of Zurich: Geography of Sustainability Transitions.


Djamila Lesch PhD Student, Group: Cirus Tel. +41 58 765 5660 Send Mail

Djamila Lesch supports Christian Binz in the master’s seminar at the University of Zurich: Geography of Sustainability Transitions.

Furthermore, she has been engaged in mentoring tasks for a bachelor’s seminar at the University of Zurich.


Dr. Meike Löhr Scientist, Group: Cirus, PEGO Tel. +41 58 765 6492 Send Mail

Meike Löhr has been teaching several courses on energy transitions for social scientists at the University of Oldenburg.

She also supervises theses in social sciences and transition studies at the University of Oldenburg and University of Zurich.

Publications

Binz, C., Sedlak, D., O’Callaghan, P., Truffer, B., Nesi, M., Morgenroth, E., … Wellauer, S. (2024). Mainstreaming decentralized urban water management solutions for sustainable cities. doi:10.55408/eawag:33039, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Castaldi, C. (2024). Toward a normative turn in research on the geography of innovation? Evolving perspectives on innovation, institutions, and human well-being. Progress in Economic Geography (PEG), 2(2), 100018 (8 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.peg.2024.100018, Institutional Repository
Gong, H., Yu, Z., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2024). Beating the casino: conceptualizing an anchoring-based third route to regional development. Economic Geography, 100(2), 107-137. doi:10.1080/00130095.2023.2276474, Institutional Repository
Wainaina, G. K., & Truffer, B. (2024). The missing link for effective informal settlement upgrading: appropriation shaping the outcome of new infrastructure. Urban Studies, 61(12), 2309-2327. doi:10.1177/00420980241236077, Institutional Repository
Afghani, N., Schelbert, V., Lüthi, C., & Binz, C. (2023). On-site water reuse systems in San Francisco, United States. Lighthouse synthesis report. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Miörner, J. (2023). Normierung für transformative Innovation? Chancen und Risiken anhand des Fallbeispiels der ISO 30500 für netzunabhängige Sanitärsysteme. In A. Gertschen (Ed.), Räderwerke der Normalität. Wie Normen und Standards Vertrauen schaffen (pp. 217-231). Basel: NZZ Libro. , Institutional Repository
Gong, H., & Binz, C. (2023). Cumulative causation in regional industrial path development - a conceptual framework and case study in the videogame industry of Hamburg and Shanghai. Geoforum, 141, 103729 (13 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103729, Institutional Repository
Hacker, M. E., & Binz, C. (2023). Hybrid governance arrangements for urban infrastructure transitions: comparing the adoption of onsite water reuse in San Francisco and New York City. ACS ES&T Water, 3, 3916-3928. doi:10.1021/acsestwater.3c00327, Institutional Repository
Janz, J., Binz, C., Fischer, M., & Hänggli, A. (2023). Paradigmenwechsel im Gewässerschutz. Illustriert durch die Wasser-Timeline der Schweiz. Aqua & Gas, 103(1), 64-68. , Institutional Repository
Lesch, D., Miörner, J., & Binz, C. (2023). The role of global actors in sustainability transitions – tracing the emergence of a novel infrastructure paradigm in the sanitation sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 49, 100787 (22 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100787, Institutional Repository
Miörner, J., Schelbert, V., Lüthi, C., & Binz, C. (2023). On-site water reuse systems in Bengaluru, India. Lighthouse synthesis report. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Pakizer, K., Lieberherr, E., Farrelly, M., Bach, P. M., Saurí, D., March, H., … Binz, C. (2023). Policy sequencing for early-stage transition dynamics - a process model and comparative case study in the water sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48, 100730 (20 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100730, Institutional Repository
Schelbert, V., Lüthi, C., Binz, C., & Miörner, J. (2023). "Tre-Rör-Ut" in Helsingborg, Sweden. Lighthouse synthesis report. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Schelbert, V., Lüthi, C., & Binz, C. (2023). Hamburg water cycle in the Jenfelder Au, Hamburg, Germany. Lighthouse synthesis report. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Schelbert, V., Binz, C., & Lüthi, C. (2023). Lighthouse initiatives in the urban water & sanitation sector. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Schelbert, V., Lüthi, C., Binz, C., & Mitra, A. (2023). On-site water reuse systems in Nirvana County, Gurugram, India. Lighthouse synthesis report. Dübendorf: Eawag. , Institutional Repository
Wagner, T. R., Nelson, K. L., Binz, C., & Hacker, M. E. (2023). Actor roles and networks in implementing urban water innovation: a study of onsite water reuse in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environmental Science and Technology, 57(15), 6205-6215. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c05231, Institutional Repository
Wainaina, G. K., Truffer, B., & Murphy, J. T. (2023). Structural tensions limiting success of infrastructure upgrading: a multi-regime perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48, 100747 (13 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100747, Institutional Repository
Wainaina, G. K., Truffer, B., Lüthi, C., & Mang’ira, P. K. (2023). The lack of organizational learning in slum upgrading success: the case of the Kenya Informal Settlement Improvement Programme 2011–2020. Environment and Urbanization, 35(2), 490-507. doi:10.1177/09562478231175041, Institutional Repository
Yap, X. S., Heiberg, J., & Truffer, B. (2023). The emerging global socio-technical regime for tackling space debris: A discourse network analysis. Acta Astronautica, 207, 445-454. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.01.016, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Gong, H. (2022). Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: new-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies, 56(4), 605-618. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238, Institutional Repository
Gong, H., Binz, C., Hassink, R., & Trippl, M. (2022). Emerging industries: institutions, legitimacy and system-level agency. Regional Studies, 56(4), 523-535. doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2033199, Institutional Repository
Heiberg, J., Truffer, B., & Binz, C. (2022). Assessing transitions through socio-technical configuration analysis – a methodological framework and a case study in the water sector. Research Policy, 51(1), 104363 (19 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104363, Institutional Repository
Heiberg, J., & Truffer, B. (2022). Overcoming the harmony fallacy: how values shape the course of innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 411-428. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.012, Institutional Repository
Heiberg, J., & Truffer, B. (2022). The emergence of a global innovation system – A case study from the urban water sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 43, 270-288. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.007, Institutional Repository
Hohmann, C., & Truffer, B. (2022). The infrastructure transition canvas: A tool for strategic urban infrastructure planning. Nature-Based Solutions, 2, 100039 (10 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100039, Institutional Repository
Miörner, J., Truffer, B., Binz, C., Heiberg, J., & Yap, X. S. (2022). Guidebook for applying the Socio-Technical Configuration Analysis method (GEIST working paper series, Report No.: 2022(01). sine loco: GEIST - Geography of innovation and sustainability transitions. , Institutional Repository
Miörner, J., Heiberg, J., & Binz, C. (2022). How global regimes diffuse in space - Explaining a missed transition in San Diego's water sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 29-47. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.05.005, Institutional Repository
Schippl, J., Truffer, B., & Fleischer, T. (2022). Potential impacts of institutional dynamics on the development of automated vehicles: towards sustainable mobility?. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100587 (11 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100587, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B., Rohracher, H., Kivimaa, P., Raven, R., Alkemade, F., Carvalho, L., & Feola, G. (2022). A perspective on the future of sustainability transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 331-339. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.006, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B., Maurer, M., & Heiberg, J. (2022). Modulare Wasserinfrastrukturen. Optionen für eine Zukunftsfähige Siedlungswasserwirtschaft. Aqua & Gas, 102(9), 60-65. , Institutional Repository
Wainaina, G. K., Truffer, B., & Lüthi, C. (2022). The role of institutional logics during participation in urban processes and projects: insights from a comparative analysis of upgrading fifteen informal settlements in Kenya. Cities, 128, 103799 (12 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103799, Institutional Repository
Yang, K., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2022). Shaping the directionality of sustainability transitions: the diverging development patterns of solar photovoltaics in two Chinese provinces. Regional Studies, 56(5), 751-769. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1903412, Institutional Repository
Yap, X. S., & Truffer, B. (2022). Contouring 'earth-space sustainability'. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 185-193. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.06.004, Institutional Repository
Yap, X. S., Truffer, B., Li, D., & Heimeriks, G. (2022). Towards transformative leapfrogging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 44, 226-244. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.07.003, Institutional Repository
van der Loos, A., Langeveld, R., Hekkert, M., Negro, S., & Truffer, B. (2022). Developing local industries and global value chains: the case of offshore wind. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121248 (15 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121248, Institutional Repository
Cherunya, P. C., Truffer, B., Samuel, E. M., & Lüthi, C. (2021). The challenges of livelihoods reconstruction in the context of informal settlement upgrading. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(1), 168-190. doi:10.1177/0308518X20926514, Institutional Repository
Hacker, M. E., & Binz, C. (2021). Institutional barriers to on-site alternative water systems: a conceptual framework and systematic analysis of the literature. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(12), 8267-8277. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07947, Institutional Repository
Hacker, M. E., & Binz, C. (2021). Navigating institutional complexity in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 367-381. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.003, Institutional Repository
Larsen, T. A., Gruendl, H., & Binz, C. (2021). The potential contribution of urine source separation to the SDG agenda - a review of the progress so far and future development options. Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology, 7(7), 1161-1176. doi:10.1039/D0EW01064B, Institutional Repository
Miörner, J., & Binz, C. (2021). Towards a multi-scalar perspective on transition trajectories. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 172-188. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.004, Institutional Repository
van den Bergh, J., Kivimaa, P., Raven, R., Rohracher, H., & Truffer, B. (2021). Celebrating a decade of EIST: What's next for transition studies?. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 18-23. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.11.001, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Gosens, J., Yap, X. S., & Yu, Z. (2020). Catch-up dynamics in early industry lifecycle stages - a typology and comparative case studies in four clean-tech industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(5), 1257-1275. doi:10.1093/icc/dtaa020, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., & Truffer, B. (2020). Geographies of transition - from topical concerns to theoretical engagement: a commentary on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 1-3. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The governance of global innovation systems: putting knowledge in context. In J. Glückler, G. Herrigel, & M. Handke (Eds.), Knowledge and space: Vol. 15. Knowledge for governance (pp. 397-414). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47150-7_17, Institutional Repository
Cherunya, P. C., Ahlborg, H., & Truffer, B. (2020). Anchoring innovations in oscillating domestic spaces: why sanitation service offerings fail in informal settlements. Research Policy, 49(1), 103841 (16 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103841, Institutional Repository
Gosens, J., Binz, C., & Lema, R. (2020). China's role in the next phase of the energy transition: contributions to global niche formation in the Concentrated Solar Power sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 61-75. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.004, Institutional Repository
Heiberg, J., Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2020). The Geography of technology legitimation: how multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography, 96(5), 470-498. doi:10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189, Institutional Repository
Hipp, A., & Binz, C. (2020). Firm survival in complex value chains and global innovation systems: evidence from solar photovoltaics. Research Policy, 49(1), 103876 (16 pp.). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103876, Institutional Repository
Hoffmann, S., Feldmann, U., Bach, P. M., Binz, C., Farrelly, M., Frantzeskaki, N., … Udert, K. M. (2020). A research agenda for the future of urban water management: exploring the potential of non-grid, small-grid, and hybrid solutions. Environmental Science and Technology, 54(9), 5312-5322. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05222, Institutional Repository
Schippl, J., & Truffer, B. (2020). Directionality of transitions in space: diverging trajectories of electric mobility and autonomous driving in urban and rural settlement structures. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 345-360. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.007, Institutional Repository
van Welie, M. J., Boon, W. P. C., & Truffer, B. (2020). Innovation system formation in international development cooperation: the role of intermediaries in urban sanitation. Science and Public Policy, 47(3), 333-347. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa015, Institutional Repository
Gebauer, H., & Binz, C. (2019). Regional benefits of servitization processes: evidence from the wind-to-energy industry. Regional Studies, 53(3), 366-375. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1479523, Institutional Repository
Meelen, T., Truffer, B., & Schwanen, T. (2019). Virtual user communities contributing to upscaling innovations in transitions: the case of electric vehicles. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 96-109. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.002, Institutional Repository
Worch, H., Kabinga, M., Eberhard, A., Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2019). Why the lights went out: a capability perspective on the unintended consequences of sector reform processes. In N. Gil, A. Stafford, & I. Musonda (Eds.), Duality by design. The global race to build Africa's infrastructure (pp. 33-68). doi:10.1017/9781108562492.003, Institutional Repository
Yap, X. S., & Truffer, B. (2019). Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: a systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity. Research Policy, 48, 1030-1047. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.002, Institutional Repository
van Welie, M. J., Truffer, B., & Gebauer, H. (2019). Innovation challenges of utilities in informal settlements: combining a capabilities and regime perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 84-101. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.03.006, Institutional Repository
van Welie, M. J., Truffer, B., & Yap, X. S. (2019). Towards sustainable urban basic services in low-income countries: a Technological Innovation System analysis of sanitation value chains in Nairobi. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 196-214. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.002, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Razavian, N. B., & Kiparsky, M. (2018). Of dreamliners and drinking water: developing risk regulation and a safety culture for direct potable reuse. Water Resources Management, 32(2), 511-525. doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1824-1, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Anadon, L. D. (2018). Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts - the emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 14-34. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.03.005, Institutional Repository
Eggimann, S., Truffer, B., Feldmann, U., & Maurer, M. (2018). Screening European market potentials for small modular wastewater treatment systems – an inroad to sustainability transitions in urban water management?. Land Use Policy, 78, 711-725. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.031, Institutional Repository
Fuenfschilling, L., & Binz, C. (2018). Global socio-technical regimes. Research Policy, 47(4), 735-749. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003, Institutional Repository
van Welie, M. J., Cherunya, P. C., Truffer, B., & Murphy, J. T. (2018). Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: the case of Nairobi's splintered sanitation regime. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Anchoring global networks in urban niches. How on-site water recycling emerged in three chinese cities. In N. Frantzeskaki, V. Castán Broto, L. Coenen, & D. Loorbach (Eds.), Routledge Studies in Sustainability Transitions: Vol. 5. Urban Sustainability Transitions (pp. 23-36). doi:10.4324/9781315228389, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems - a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284-1298. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Gosens, J., Hansen, T., & Hansen, U. E. (2017). Toward technology-sensitive catching-up policies: insights from renewable energy in China. World Development, 96, 418-437. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.027, Institutional Repository
Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31-45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460, Institutional Repository
Pohl, C., Truffer, B., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017). Addressing wicked problems through transdisciplinary research. In R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, & R. C. S. Pacheco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 319-331). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.26, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B., Schippl, J., & Fleischer, T. (2017). Decentering technology in technology assessment: prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 34-48. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.020, Institutional Repository
Weber, K. M., & Truffer, B. (2017). Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 101-121. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx002, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172-200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177, Institutional Repository
Binz, C., Harris-Lovett, S., Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The thorny road to technology legitimation — Institutional work for potable water reuse in California. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 249-263. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005, Institutional Repository
Eggimann, S., Truffer, B., & Maurer, M. (2016). Economies of density for on-site waste water treatment. Water Research, 101, 476-489. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.011, Institutional Repository
Eggimann, S., Truffer, B., & Maurer, M. (2016). The cost of hybrid waste water systems: a systematic framework for specifying minimum cost-connection rates. Water Research, 103, 472-484. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.062, Institutional Repository
Eggimann, S. J. (2016). The optimal degree of centralisation for wastewater infrastructures. A model-based geospatial economic analysis (Doctoral dissertation). doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010811248, Institutional Repository
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems: an analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 298-312. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023, Institutional Repository
Kiparsky, M., Thompson Jr., B. H., Binz, C., Sedlak, D. L., Tummers, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). Barriers to innovation in urban wastewater utilities: attitudes of managers in California. Environmental Management, 57(6), 1204-1216. doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0685-3, Institutional Repository
Larsen, T. A., Hoffmann, S., Lüthi, C., Truffer, B., & Maurer, M. (2016). Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world. Science, 352(6288), 928-933. doi:10.1126/science.aad8641, Institutional Repository
Lieberherr, E., Truffer, B., & Dominguez, D. (2016). Innovation and public management. Comparing dynamic capabilities in two Swiss wastewater utilities. In M. Finger & C. Jaag (Eds.), Routledge companions in business, management and accounting. The Routledge companion to network industries (pp. 389-402). Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315768984-37/innovation-public-management-comparing-dynamic-capabilities-two-swiss-wastewater-utilities-eva-lieberherr-bernhard-truffer-damian-dominguez?context=ubx&refId=d80e4bc7-1ccd-47a0-9f4c, Institutional Repository
Markard, J., Wirth, S., & Truffer, B. (2016). Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – a framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy, 45(1), 330-344. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009, Institutional Repository
Zinsstag, J., Perrig-Chiello, P., Paulsen, T., & Truffer, B. (2016). Exemplary Transdisciplinary Projects - swiss-academies award for transdisciplinary research 2015. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 182-184. doi:10.14512/gaia.25.3.9, Institutional Repository
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51-64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003, Institutional Repository
Eggimann, S., Truffer, B., & Maurer, M. (2015). To connect or not to connect? Modelling the optimal degree of centralisation for wastewater infrastructures. Water Research, 84, 218-231. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.004, Institutional Repository
Harris-Lovett, S. R., Binz, C., Sedlak, D. L., Kiparsky, M., & Truffer, B. (2015). Beyond user acceptance: a legitimacy framework for potable water reuse in California. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(13), 7552-7561. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00504, Institutional Repository
Lieberherr, E., & Truffer, B. (2015). The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: a comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 15, 101-122. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.002, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B. (2015). Challenges for Technological Innovation Systems research: introduction to a debate. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 65-66. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.007, Institutional Repository
Truffer, B., Murphy, J. T., & Raven, R. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: contours of an emerging theme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.004, Institutional Repository
Weichselgartner, J., & Truffer, B. (2015). From knowledge co-production to transdisciplinary research: lessons from the quest to produce socially robust knowledge. In B. Werlen (Ed.), Global sustainability. Cultural perspectives and challenges for transdisciplinary integrated research (pp. 89-106). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_5, Institutional Repository

See a list of all ESS publications

Current Projects

We are identifying the challenges of modular infrastructure systems for the Swiss economy and society using the example of urban water management.
The Lighthouse Project focuses on visible examples of onsite and decentralised urban water management systems, which will play a key role in enabling sustainability transitions.
WaterReuseLab aims at analyzing how a new generation of decentralized water reuse systems could be developed in Bengaluru, India
Efficient Technical Cycles project analyses potential future transition of the construction sector towards more sustainable techniques, materials, methods and procedures
MULTITRANS develops novel approaches for analyzing sustainability transitions that transcend places, scales and sectors
SHIVAGO analyzes valuation processes shaping global industry dynamics and sectoral transitions in view of grand societal challenges

Past projects

The proposal analyzes possible transition pathways in basic services, focusing specifically on the case of Nairobi, Kenya.
The project promotes the implementaion of RRR business models in Lima, Peru by improving the local institutional framework and technical capacities of interested entrepreneurs.
The purpose of the strategic research alliance is to analyse the nature of the energy innovation systems in Denmark.
The project will analyze the indicators for sustainable transitions in China water treatment industry.
In this project, we apply Business Model Thinking to create promising business models around innovative water and sanitation technologies
In this project, we collaborate with various organizations to study the role of business innovation in the scaling process of sanitation services.
In this project, we work with organizations from around the globe to identify factors for managing water kiosks sucessfully
We seek to understand how formal and informal institutions, planning procedures and resources drive or constrain informal settlements upgrading in Sub Saharan Africa cities.
RADEC seeks to unravel how emerging countries can simultaneously achieve industrial leapfrogging and environmental sustainability transition by analyzing the industrial and socio-technical aspects of decentralized water and sanitation systems in China, India and South Africa.
An inter- and transdisciplinary strategic research program that strives to develop novel non-gridconnected water and sani- tation systems that can function as comparable alternatives to network-based systems.
GLORIWA assesses path dependencies in urban water management by analyzing the global actor structures and institutional rationalities that stabilize the current dominant design